|
EDU 3326 - Child Growth and Development Fall 2004 |
|
Students:
Susanna Vinson & Kristina Fulgham Date:
December 9, 2004 Statement
of Problem:
According to Vygotsky, memory is a culturally conditioned action that
improves over time as children learn to use their memory in a logical, voluntary
way through social interactions. Werner, on the other hand, believed
that older children's improvement in memory comes from a developmental process
by which perception moves from being physiognomic to geometric-technical. Werner
believes that while the more abstract, technical approach to perception improves
memory quantitatively, it notably lessens the quality of younger children's rich
memory. Reflecting upon these ideas, the question arises as to
whether the structured, logical approach to memory will hinder the natural
ability of the younger children while assisting the older. Is it
really true that older children, whom Vygotsky would say have culturally
acquired better memory skills, but who no longer have the richness of perception
and eidetic imagery that Werner says younger children possess, will remember
more than the younger children? Guiding
Questions: ·
Will kindergartners or third-graders remember more details from a
photograph they have examined without being instructed to remember as much as
possible? ·
Which age group will remember more details from the photograph if they
are told to remember as much as possible? ·
How will the instruction affect the success of recall in each age group? ·
What strategies did the kindergartners and third-graders use to remember
when asked to do so? ·
Will our findings support Vygotsky’s theory that older children
remember more because they have been culturally conditioned to do so or
Werner’s theory that older children remember more because of
geometric-technical perception? Hypothesis:
The kindergartners will remember more overall than the third graders,
though they will not benefit from being told beforehand that they will have to
remember the scene. Also, even though the third graders will not
remember as much as the kindergartners overall, they will do much better when
told beforehand to try to remember the scene. Vygotsky, Lev (1929) The Problem of the Cultural Development of the Child: Online, 10 Oct. 2004. <http://web.archive.org/web/20010504220424/www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1929/cultural_development.htm> This is Vygotsky’s own work in which he discusses, among other things, his theory of the social conditioning of the use of memory in children. He does not spend very much time on this topic, but does outline it in a simple manner. “Learning
About Memory for Permanent Memory Improvement: Research Reports” Online,
20 Oct., 2004. <http://www.memory-key.com/Parents/learning_strategies_research.htm > This web page cites and briefly describes research that is very relevant to our topic, including differences in the affects of memory instruction on younger and older children Crain,
William. Werner’s Organismic and Comparative Theory in Theories of Development, Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall,
2005. pp. 87-111 Crain
gives a short overview of Heinz Werner’s life and theories and then discusses
his work and interests in more depth. He relates Werner’s work to the concerns
of today and laudibly respects and defends the value of Werner’s often
belittled or ignored contributions to the world of developmental psychology. Terms
To Be Defined: Werner:
Vygotsky:
Equipment: Felt
Board 22
items to forming a coherent scene (Beach with palm trees, children, buckets,
balls, shells, etc.) 22
different items forming another coherent scene (Farm scene with a barn, animals,
landscape, etc.) Notepad
and pencil to take notes Methodology/Procedures: •
Select five kindergartners and five third-graders. First
time: (kindergartners and third-graders)
Second
time: (same kindergartners and third
graders)
Later:
|
|
This website was created by Susanna Vinson. Last updated Tuesday, December 14, 2004 . ©All materials copyright 2004 by Kristina Fulgham and Susanna Vinson |